spdup.net

Tech news

Boosting AI Coding Efficiency with GPT-5 Codeex and GLM-4.6 – A Multi‑Agent Setup That Cuts Cost and Improves Performance


Boosting AI Coding Efficiency with GPT-5 Codeex and GLM-4.6 – A Multi‑Agent Setup That Cuts Cost and Improves Performance

Introduction

Developers increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to automate coding tasks such as planning, refactoring, and debugging. While GLM-4.6 has earned a reputation for versatility and low pricing, users often encounter reliability issues when the model is asked to perform detailed reasoning or debugging. A pragmatic solution combines the strengths of GLM-4.6 with GPT-5 Codeex, creating a multi‑agent workflow that delivers up to 3× lower costs and 2× higher performance compared with Claude‑based coding assistants.


Why GLM-4.6 Falls Short on Complex Reasoning

Inconsistent Debugging and Planning

  • GLM‑4.6 can become finicky when asked to debug intricate code or generate comprehensive plans. The model may drift off‑topic or produce incomplete reasoning traces.
  • Unlike Claude‑based tools (e.g., Kilo, Rue, Claude Code), GLM‑4.6 does not natively expose its internal reasoning steps, making it difficult to audit the model’s thought process.

Tool‑Call Interference

  • When GLM‑4.6 attempts to embed tool calls within its reasoning output, the result is a garbled response that breaks downstream processing.
  • The developers behind Kilo have temporarily disabled tool‑call support for GLM‑4.6 while working on a cleaner integration.

Buggy Autoreasoning

  • Even when autoreasoning is enabled, GLM‑4.6 can enter long, unproductive loops, limiting its usefulness for large‑scale refactors.

Introducing GPT‑5 Codeex as a Complementary Agent

GPT‑5 Codeex excels at structured planning and deep debugging while remaining cheaper than Claude Sonnet for comparable workloads. Its key advantages include:

  • Robust planning: Generates clear, step‑by‑step refactor outlines that can be saved directly to markdown files.
  • Effective debugging: Handles both minor and major code issues, especially when supplied with logs.
  • Cost efficiency: Provides higher quality output without a proportional increase in API spend.

Building the Multi‑Agent Workflow in Kilo

Kilo’s UI supports multiple operational modes—architect, code, debug, and orchestrator—allowing you to assign the most suitable model to each stage.

1. Set Up Architect Mode with GPT‑5 Codeex

  1. Open Kilo and select Architect Mode.
  2. In the model selector, choose GPT‑5 Codeex.
  3. Prompt the model to produce a refactor plan and request that the plan be saved as a markdown file.
  4. Iterate on the plan if needed before moving to the next stage.

2. Apply Changes in Code Mode Using GLM‑4.6

  1. Switch to Code Mode and set the default model to GLM‑4.6.
  2. Feed the previously generated markdown plan to GLM‑4.6, which will execute the code modifications.
  3. Review the generated patches; GLM‑4.6 typically handles straightforward edits efficiently.

3. Debug Complex Issues with GPT‑5 Codeex

  1. If the changes introduce errors, move to Debug Mode.
  2. Set the default model to GPT‑5 Codeex.
  3. Provide relevant logs and error messages; GPT‑5 Codeex will pinpoint root causes and suggest fixes.

4. (Optional) Automate the Pipeline with Orchestrator Mode

  • Assign GPT‑5 Codeex as the orchestrator.
  • Configure the orchestrator to call GLM‑4.6 for code execution and GPT‑5 Codeex for planning and debugging.
  • This hands‑off approach is ideal for batch jobs where human oversight is not required.

Performance and Cost Analysis

TaskPreferred ModelReason
High‑level planningGPT‑5 CodeexGenerates clear, markdown‑ready outlines
Straightforward code editsGLM‑4.6Low latency, inexpensive execution
Deep debugging (large logs)GPT‑5 CodeexSuperior error‑trace analysis
  • Monthly API spend: Adding GPT‑5 Codeex to a GLM‑4.6‑centric workflow typically adds ≈ $20 per month.
  • Performance gain: Users report 20‑30 % faster resolution of complex repositories, with some cases seeing over 2× improvement.
  • Speed considerations: GPT‑5 Codeex can be slower per request than GLM‑4.6, but the higher quality reduces the number of iterative calls, offsetting latency.

Tooling Ecosystem: Current Gaps and Future Directions

  • Many third‑party interfaces (Kilo, Rue, Klein) are fine‑tuned for Claude models, leaving GLM‑4.6 under‑supported.
  • Kilo is actively improving GLM‑4.6 compatibility, especially around tool‑call handling.
  • Klein currently lacks support for GLM‑4.6 planning features, limiting its usefulness for developers who rely on markdown‑based plans.
  • The industry trend of over‑optimizing for Claude models may obscure the cost‑performance advantages of alternatives like GLM‑4.6 and GPT‑5 Codeex.

Conclusion

A hybrid workflow that leverages GPT‑5 Codeex for planning and debugging while delegating routine code edits to GLM‑4.6 delivers a compelling balance of cost, speed, and reliability. By configuring Kilo’s multiple modes—or employing an orchestrator for fully automated pipelines—developers can achieve performance that surpasses Claude‑based solutions without a proportional increase in expense.

Adopting this multi‑agent approach positions teams to capitalize on the strengths of each model, ensuring that code‑generation tasks remain both efficient and high‑quality in the rapidly evolving AI‑assisted development landscape.

Watch Original Video